- Collide - Generational Leadership
- Posts
- What the End of MTV Says About the Future of Generational Culture
What the End of MTV Says About the Future of Generational Culture
It took a century for sound to travel from a tinfoil cylinder to our pockets. In that time, music went from uniting generations to dividing them by algorithm.

In 1877, Thomas Edison recited “Mary Had a Little Lamb” into a tinfoil cylinder, and for the first time, sound was captured and replayed (Library of Congress, n.d.). A century and a half later, nearly every song ever recorded sits in our pocket, streamable, repeatable, and shuffled by algorithm. Between those two moments lies the story of how music became not just a sound, but a social force that shaped and mirrored every generation.
It was just announced that another major milestone in the history of music is being written. Last week, Paramount Global confirmed that five MTV music channels will go dark on December 31, 2025, leaving only MTV HD to air reality reruns (D’Souza, 2025; Singh, 2025). After four decades of being at the forefront of defining culture, the channel that once told generations what to wear, say, and sing will sign off for the last time.
When MTV launched in August 1981, it didn’t just play music videos, it broadcast culture. The first words broadcast 16,159 days ago were, “Ladies and gentlemen, rock and roll.” (Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, 2021). MTV was a place where Madonna’s choreography, Michael Jackson’s “Thriller,” and Nirvana’s “Smells Like Teen Spirit” didn’t just top charts, they shaped a generation. Gen X was most shaped by the music videos played on MTV. As the latchkey generation, they grew up letting themselves into empty houses after school and being met by the glow of MTV in the living room.
Music - A Unifying Force Within a Generation
Music has always been a key way for generations to unify around ideas, artists, or movements. In fact, when I speak to audiences or teams on generations, I point to music as being so defining of one’s upbringing.
For example, I will often do a little experiment. I will have everyone in the room pair up with someone from a different generation. They will share their birth year (surprisingly, people are not often resistant to this), and both pull out their phones and look up the Billboard charts for the other person’s birth year. Chances are, the person does not know any of the top 5 songs on the chart the year of their birth. Yet fast forward a decade, and they know all of them.
Last week, I was at a dinner for a business school I am on the board of. At my table was a Gen Xer, myself (a Millennial), and the rest were Gen Z. They did not know of Cher or George Michael, Daughtry or The Fray. The last two had chart-topping songs the year they were born. It’s amazing how a few years can make a big difference.
A Brief Timeline of Music Across the Generations
In the 1920s, radio transformed music into a national experience. Jazz floated from living rooms to dance halls, and artists like Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington turned local rhythms into American identity (Pew Research Center, 2015). During the Great Depression, swing kept spirits alive. During World War II, the crooners soothed uncertainty (American Sociological Association, 2018). Music wasn’t just entertainment, it was a unifying cultural experience.
By mid-century, technology began to personalize that architecture. Vinyl records, introduced in 1948, turned listening into a ritual, something later-born Millennials and early-Gen Zers later resurrected. There is something satisfying about sliding the disc from its sleeve, lowering the needle, and hearing the gentle crackle before the song began (Recording Industry Association of America, 2023). In the 1960s and 70s, 8-tracks and cassettes made music mobile. For the first time, you could bring your soundtrack to the car or the sidewalk. That portability made music more than something you heard, it became something you carried along with you (RIAA, 2023).
By the early 1980s, the compact disc promised perfect sound and permanence. For Millennials, the CD wasn’t just a format—it was a badge of belonging, lined up on bedroom shelves in alphabetical pride. Around that same time came MTV, which added a visual dimension to that fidelity, bringing revolutionary music right to the comfort of your couch. Where once you traveled to the music, now the music came to you.
Sony’s Walkman (1979) put private sound in public spaces, a personal concert on every commute (Sony Archives, 2019). Apple’s iPod, launched in 2001, did the same for the digital age—1,000 songs in your pocket (Apple, 2001). Platforms like Napster, iTunes, and later Spotify and Apple Music dissolved the line between artist and audience. Napster made sharing music instantaneous, if not entirely legal, reshaping an entire industry (Rolling Stone, 2019). iTunes made it commercial. Spotify made it infinite. Streaming didn’t just change how we listened; it changed what we valued. Music was no longer a product to purchase; it became a constant companion, personalized, predictive, and perpetually new (IFPI, 2024).
As a Millennial, I caught the tail end of mixtape era. Albeit, my tapes were actually burning CDs. Then it became sharing playlists. And now, instead of sharing messages with our friends via music, we let the algorithms tell us what to listen to next.

Music, once the great unifier, now fragments us into digital cultural subsets. It is fascinating, if you pause to think for just a moment, the story of music creates an eerie parallel to the individualizing of Western Society.
First, we had to listen to music together, in person, as a group. Then, as music was recorded and broadcast, we could listen at home with our families. Next, it became personal, in our ears. It continued to evolve to the point where we no longer had to listen to an album in order, we could skip songs. Then we could buy the songs we wanted to hear and leave the rest behind. And now, the machine minds serve up what they think we should hear.
Society has become increasingly individualistic, and music, whether by causation or correlation, has followed suit. Where MTV gave us one collective feed, streaming platforms give each of us our own. Algorithms feed us more of what we already like, tightening the feedback loop of taste. Eighty-five percent of Spotify users now say they discover new music primarily through algorithmic recommendations (Spotify, 2024).
It’s a paradox: we’ve never been more connected globally or more divided culturally. Technology shrinks distance but accentuates difference. In the 1990s, you could identify someone’s identity by their CD wallet and separate the goths from the punks from the jocks. Today, those tribes are algorithmic, invisible, scattered across digital playlists. The new subcultures are not defined by geography but by data patterns.
Subscribe to These Interesting Newsletters:
IPO Stream (Free weekly email on IPO insights)
MarketingAlex (Free advice on utilizing AI to optimize efficiency)
Revenue Memo (Unpacks how great companies make money)
When Music Led Movements
Music has always played a significant role in society. During the Civil Rights era, songs such as “We Shall Overcome” became not just hymns but flags of hope. Pete Seeger and Joan Baez first popularized it at rallies like the 1963 March on Washington (“We Shall Overcome,” n.d.). In the swirl of the 1960s, the rise of Motown Records offered Black artists a mainstream stage and a cultural bridge: its pop-soul hits like “Dancing in the Street” became soundtracks for both celebration and protest, marking the label as “a beacon of racial integration” (Houston Symphony, 2024).
When the Vietnam War escalated, so did the music of dissent. Tracks such as “Fortunate Son” voiced the anger of soldiers returning home and the generations that followed. By the 1980s, collaborative mega-singles like “We Are the World” (1985) brought together dozens of superstar voices including Michael Jackson and Lionel Richie, raising more than $80 million USD for famine relief and creating a rare moment of global musical solidarity (Sinha, 2024).
Even in the 21st century, music continues this role. Artists such as Taylor Swift don’t just release albums, they mobilize movements. Just last year, a study found that 35% of Americans under 30 said Swift’s political engagement made them more likely to vote. (Morning Consult, 2024).
Music has always been instrumental, but it is certainly changing its tune (yes, intentional pun dad joke).
The Leadership Challenge in a Fragmented Soundtrack
There’s a reason MTV is shutting down its music channels. Not because music died, but because we stopped listening together. For four decades, MTV represented something simple yet profound, a shared cultural moment. You didn’t just watch a video; you joined a conversation that half your school could talk about the next morning.
Those moments are evolving, and at times disappearing. For most of human history, music was communal. It was sung, not streamed. It was played in fields, churches, and living rooms. Only in the past century has music become a mass medium, and for a fleeting moment, it united generations. The Beatles, Queen, Whitney, Tupac, Taylor—all soundtracks to shared seasons of life. But with every technological leap, from radio to records to streaming, the togetherness that once defined music has splintered. Algorithms now define taste more than geography, friends, or even generations.
That’s what makes MTV’s closure more than nostalgic, it’s diagnostic. It signals the end of shared cultural soundtracks and the rise of personalized frequencies. Leaders today face that same challenge. Every person, every team member, every generation you lead is now shaped by an individualized feed of ideas, values, and influences. Cohorts aren’t just defined by birth years anymore, they’re defined by experiences that are curated (by machines), global, and often invisible.
Leadership in this new age requires more than understanding generations. it requires curiosity about micro-cultures. It means recognizing that the people you lead aren’t hearing the same song anymore. The task isn’t to make everyone listen to the same tune, but to create moments where they still feel part of something larger than themselves.
another one:
![]() | Hi, 👋 I’m Ryan!Thanks for reading! After 20 years as an executive building and leading companies, I have found my true passion as a generational futurist, speaker, and consultant who equips today’s leaders to navigate change and lead across generations. I love to help leaders and organizations turn cultural friction into forward momentum. Learn more at RyanVet.com. 📚I’m Currently Reading: 2084 📺 Watch My Latest Leadership Video: Busyness Kills Business |
The Gold standard for AI news
AI keeps coming up at work, but you still don't get it?
That's exactly why 1M+ professionals working at Google, Meta, and OpenAI read Superhuman AI daily.
Here's what you get:
Daily AI news that matters for your career - Filtered from 1000s of sources so you know what affects your industry.
Step-by-step tutorials you can use immediately - Real prompts and workflows that solve actual business problems.
New AI tools tested and reviewed - We try everything to deliver tools that drive real results.
All in just 3 minutes a day
Works Cited
American Sociological Association. (2018). Music and society: Cultural reflection and change.
Apple. (2001, October 23). Apple unveils iPod. Apple Press Release Archive. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2001/10/23Apple-Unveils-iPod/
D’Souza, S. (2025, October 18). ‘No one makes money from them’: With MTV channels switching off, is the music video under threat? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com
Houston Symphony. (2024, February 12). The sound that changed America: The history of Motown.https://houstonsymphony.org/the-sound-that-changed-america-the-history-of-motown/
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. (2024). Global music report 2024. London, England: Author.
Library of Congress. (n.d.). The history of recorded sound. https://www.loc.gov/programs/national-recording-preservation-plan/
Morning Consult. (2024, February 7). Taylor Swift’s political influence survey: The power of celebrity in civic engagement. https://morningconsult.com
Pew Research Center. (2015, March 19). Generations and technology: Defining the latchkey years. Washington, DC: Author.
Recording Industry Association of America. (2023). The evolution of recorded music formats. Washington, DC: Author.
Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. (2021, August 1). MTV and the birth of the music video era. Cleveland, OH: Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Archives.
Rolling Stone. (2019, June 1). Napster, 20 years later: How it changed the music industry. Rolling Stone.https://www.rollingstone.com
Singh, D. (2025, October 12). MTV to shut its popular music TV channels after four decades. The Economic Times.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com
Sinha, J. (2024, January 26). The Greatest Night in Pop revisits We Are the World and a moment when music tried to save the world. Time. https://time.com/6588802/netflix-doc-greatest-night-in-pop-we-are-the-world/
Sony Archives. (2019). The Walkman story. Tokyo, Japan: Sony Corporation.
Spotify. (2024). Culture Next 2024: Global trends in audio and youth identity. Spotify Research. https://newsroom.spotify.com
We Shall Overcome. (n.d.). In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved October 28, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/We-Shall-Overcome





Reply